HANTSPORT'S POSSIBLE DISSOLUTION AND FUTURE

To view COMMENTS, see original posts. Go to bottom of your screen, and click on Older Posts.

Feb. 27

INFOR ON UARB HEARINGS 10/02/15

Info on UARB Hearings

The following is an email the blog received today:  Heather: John Morash passed along your questions about the NSUARB Hearings.  The advertisements from the NSUARB are not posted yet, but they will give lots of information.  If you scan through the enclosed Preliminary Order, all of the time points are there. The Board sets its own procedures, but I was present at the Bridgetown and Springhill Hearings, and there were no restrictions placed on where speakers were from. The important thing is to have folks register or mail in comments by the deadline in the order (and in the advertisements to come).  If you want to see an example of the ad, the one for the Hantsport Water Rate Hearing earlier in March is now on their web site under the Hearings tab. If you look at the timeline, the hearings begin on Monday, March 23 at 1:30pm.  How many days they go will depend on how much evidence there is and how many speakers sign up for the evening sessions.  Normally the Board would sit in the days to consider evidence, then come back in the evening for the speakers. The NSUARB web site has email and other contacts if you would like more information. Mine notes here are more informal, but give me a call if you have any questions. Brian Smith Interim CAO, Town of Hantsport Cell:  902-670-8531 I went on line to NSUARB, searched for Cases, found Hantsport under open and saw the Preliminary Order but could not copy and paste it. Brian Smith said to me today that Karrie will put all the dates and information in the next Town Newsletter. -Heather

Villages are NOT "toast" in Nova Scotia 07/02/15

You may have heard that "the Government [or the province] has decided to do

away with villages in Nova Scotia." That is not true.

What actually happened is this: A committee formed two years ago just submitted

a Report with 43 Recommendations to the Dept. of Municipal Affairs. One of them

is that no new villages be formed, and another is that all existing villages be

dissolved.

On December 8, the Minister of Municipal Affairs announced that he had received

the Report, and made the Report public. He did not say that he agrees with any of

its recommendations. Quite the contrary He noted that the committee was formed by the previous Government (not his), that the present Government "has not accept"or endorsed the recommendations," that the Dept. of Municipal Affairs would "doan analysis" of the" Report, that they are just beginning the process of looking at the Report, and that there is "no timeline" as to when they

will finish. In other words, they are going to take plenty of time figuring out what

to do with a very hot potato.[Keep in mind that nearly 50,000 Nova Scotians

who live in our 22 villages (10 % of our rural population) really like their

villages...]

Bottom line: The staff of the Department of Municipal Affairs have not made a

decision on the village issue; they have not made a recommendation to the

Minister, who has not made a recommendation to Cabinet which has not drafted a

Bill to terminate our villages, and has not introduced any such Bill into the

Legislature, which has not passed any such Bill, and the Lieutenant Governor has

not signed any such Bill. All of which would have to happen before villages would

be "toast" in Nova Scotia. 

In short, what you heard is just another "urban legend''. The existing Municipal

Act is still in force, and that is the Legislation under which the Utility Review Board

is legally obliged to operate when they decide on Hantsport's future. The Act still

states that if a Town dissolves it can become a Village. Our 22 Nova Scotia villages

are still thriving; and it is entirely possible that the Board, upon reviewing the

evidence, will decide that Hantport will become the 23rd Village in Nova Scotia.

And, oh yes, don't forget: it is the Board, not the Government who will decide.

They are the judge and jury in this case, and there is no appeal; the Government

cannot reverse their decision which is why the hearings which begin on March 23

are very important to the citizens of Hantsport.

Joe Foy

HANTSPORT A LIMITED VILLAGE 27/01/15

Should Hantsport become a "limited services" Village? 

Letter given to Hantsport Council, Committee of the Whole, Jan. 20, 2015

Last Spring, we all gathered in the Fire Hall to talk with the Utility Review

Board about an important part of our future together: Town or not, and if

not, what?

One idea that floated onto the table was a good ole Nova Scotia idea:

village.The Public Utility Board promised that that idea would be taken

seriously. Hantsport citizens then asked the Town to take it seriously and

the Council agreed. And so it became a key part of the Grant Thornton

Report. Hantsport as a Village: good idea or not?

Grant Thornton knew that Hantsport had operated very well as a Town for

over a century, and that "those who like it like it a lot." For the most part,

Hantsportians newcomers and old-timers alike, they like their town.

Grant Thornton also knew that, unless the current rules of the game were

changed, we probably could not afford to remain a Town. And when they

were hired by the Town to crunch the numbers, they were expressly directed

to look at the village idea.

And they did. And they took their job seriously. They listed the elements

of a "village" -- which is what you have to do before you can figure out the

costs. This is what would be involved, and this is what it would cost.

Knowing how much we liked being a Town, they imagined Hantsport as a

Village which is "almost a town." So, for example, the community would

keep the existing Town Hall ,which would become the Village Hall . And, as

a village, we would keep doing most of the things that a Town would do.

Unfortunately, it turns out that a "Village which is almost a Town"also costs

almost as much as a Town. So when the costs came in, they were like a

torpedo amidships to the 'village idea'. It just faded away, into the sunset .

I go to church in the Village of Canning. While there, I recently learned that

Canning's residential Village rate (including the fire rate) was 40 cents per

hundred. This caught my attention, since it was much lower than the

projected village rate for Hantsport. Why?I wondered; Canning is bigger

than Hantsport. So I asked for a copy of the Village budget. And the

answer is easy to see: they don't do "most of the things that a town can do."

They do just a handful of things. They are a different type of a village: call

it a 'small scale', or a 'limited services' village.

This prompted me to examine the budgets of a half-dozen villages, and talk

to their Clerks.What I quickly learned is that, quite unlike being clones of a

town, they are literally"all over the map." VARIETY is the order of the day

in Nova Scotia villages. They do very different things, and they do them in

very different ways. Some have 3 commissioners, some have 5. In some

(e.g. Weymouth), the commissioners serve a s volunteers; in others they get

a small stipend. Port Williams does a library. Weymouth, instead does a

medical clinic. Port Williams does water and sewers. Canning does water;

but not sewers (the County does the sewers). There is probably a village

out there that does neither water nor sewers! Some do sidewalks, others

do not. Some do snow removal, others do not. Some do streetlights,

others do not. And on and on it goes.

Interestingly most do fire departments. But here is what is really

interesting. Take Canning and Port Williams. It's their fire department;

they own the building; they run the department . BUT the country pays ALL

the operational costs! Why, because the county does not WANT to run a fire

department. They are delighted to have the village run it! And so are the

folks in Canning.

The bottom line is this: there is no fixed "recipe" for a village in N.S.

You can be a village to do just one thing. Or just two. Or just three.

Canning picked its things, Port Williams picked its things- - - and Hantsport

could pick its things. We could become a village to do just one thing:

secure the future of the new library. Or.... to secure the future of HMCC.

Which always has and probably always will, need some sort of municipal

support grant. As a village, the people of Hantsport could ensure that

support for the future. Or . . . .we could become a village to do both.

RecentlyI talked to a man who has moved here from away. He wanted to

find a home for his family within a hour's drive of Halifax. He drove all

around and eventually drove into Hantsport. The first thing he saw was the

Great Hantsport Park. The second thing he saw was the School. The third

thing he saw was a Church of his denomination. Check, check, check. The

next day -- literally -- he and his family decided to move here. I have

heard many stories like that. People who live here -- and people who move

here -- they know what is unique about Hantsport. What is special. That is

why they come, and that is why they stay.

No matter what happens, all of us want the same thing: we want to keep the

things that make Hantsport special, that make Hantsport unique, that make

this community an absolutely great place to live. The question is : How to

make that happen? One vehicle for making that happen might be. . . .

Hantsport as a 'small scale, limited services' village. "

Last night about a dozen of us met in the Anglican Church basement to talk

about this. We all agreed on this point: there are three things here that

we really, really want to preserve, and that we are sure almost every living

soul in Hantsport wants to preserve.
(1) The Fire Department
(2) The Great HMCC Park
( 3) The Hantsport Library.
Without them, Hantsport would just not be Hantsport. We think that one good way to secure their

future is for Hantsport to become a village which does those three things! Not "everything a Town does." Three things.That model of "small scale" village presents a distinct alternative to the

"Village that is almost a Town"model that has already been studied by Grant Thornton. This alternative has not yet been studied. But we think it has merit, and is worth a serious look.

I am asking you to do two things:( 1) think about it ; (2) meanwhile forward

this note to the Transition Team, and ask them to think about it too.

In the meantime, we are trying to do two things: First, using the factual

base of past Town spending, we are calculating what it would cost a Village

of Hantsport to do these 3 things: secure the Fire Department, secure

HMCC, and secure the new Library. Second, we are making up a chart

which will compare 7 or 8 villages roughly the same size as Hantsport, to

determine how they run their villages, what services they provide, and what

it costs them to do that, again based on budgets & financial statements from

those villages. In other words, we will be working from hard data, not just

from 'guesstimates.'

We hope to bring you results within 10 days.

Respectfully,

Joe Foy, 16 William Street, Hantsport

DISSOLUTION NOT A DONE DEAL YET 26/01/15

Dissolution - NOT a done deal yet!

It appears that once again journalists insist on prematurely writing off the Town of Hantsport, this time in an article entitled “A consolation for dissolution” (Ref: Chronicle Herald, Page A4, Monday January 26, 2015).

It sort of irks me that the media continues to present the situation as a done deal. Not surprising though I suppose, as almost no one on Town Council seem to go out of their way to say otherwise. The prevailing sentiment there, at least for some, is to simply dance around singing “Ding Dong the Witch is Dead” and to “Celebrate”. They really just want to get it over with. However, at the risk of being politically incorrect, it’s not really over “until the fat lady sings”, or at least until the UARB makes its determination.

As I understand it, at this point the Town of Hantsport, given its current financial situation, has simply applied to the UARB to consider dissolution as possibility, and has solicited (expensive) studies to evaluate and present the options as they see them. Then, once all the stakeholders have filed their “evidence”, the UARB will commence with formal hearings to consider the application and evidence starting on March 23, 2015.

One of the more recent documents of evidence has been submitted by the Formal Intervenors, “Think Hantsport”. Admittedly, I have not yet taken the time to read this 214 page report, but presumably it presents arguments against dissolving the Town of Hantsport, based on an alternative interpretation of “the facts” and other considerations. Maybe there’s a viable alternative presented in their submission. Ultimately, it will be up to the UARB to fairly consider all the evidence presented and make a decision, “in the best interests of the citizens of Hantport”.

The news media obviously need help getting it right, and those persons who are part of this process have a duty to present an accurate assessment of what’s going on and where we are at when providing commentary to the media. The citizens of Hantsport also need to critically think for themselves and not just believe the party line. If you’re curious about what’s going on and have access to a computer, check out the UARB website, which contains all the correspondence and submissions to date, including the schedule ( http://uarb.novascotia.ca/fmi/iwp/cgi?-db=UARBv12&-loadframes ).

Like the mostly dismembered knight on Monty Python said, we’ve “still got our teeth”, at least for now.

Thanks,

Martin Vander Baaren
32 Main Street
Hantsport